XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.california 
 From: fsmith@emuybcpl.net 
  
 Stan de SD wrote: 
  
 > "Ward Stewart"  wrote in message 
 > news:jetuiv8ooi8cuis4cfoonak0sad0rmb1rk@4ax.com... 
 > > On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 03:40:49 GMT, "Stan de SD" 
 > >  wrote: 
 > > > 
 > > > wrote in message 
 > > >news:691e612a4442a03cb79256938e5af969@free.teranews.com... 
 > > >> 
 > > >> Even if homosexuals win the right to same-sex marriage, they will 
 > > >> continue to seek multiple partnerships. Homosexual Andrew Sullivan is 
 > > >> the senior editor at The New Republic. In his book, Virtually Normal, 
 > > >> Sullivan says that straight society will learn a lot from homosexual 
 > > >> marriages if they are legalized. He notes that straights will learn to 
 > > >> have a greater "understanding of the need for extramarital outlets 
 > > >> between two men than between a man and a woman." In other words, 
 > > >> homosexuals have no intention of remaining monogamous to each other. 
 > > >> Sullivan criticizes what he calls the "stifling model of heterosexual 
 > > >> normality." 
 > > >> 
 > > >> Homosexual activist Michelangelo Signorile has openly called for the 
 > > >> abolition of marriage and family as we know it. According to 
 > > >> Signorile, writing in Out magazine, homosexuals should "fight for 
 > > >> same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine 
 > > >> the institution of marriage completely. . . . to debunk the myth and 
 > > >> radically alter an archaic institution. . . . The most subversive 
 > > >> action lesbians and gays can undertake--and one that would perhaps 
 > > >> benefit all of society--is to transform the notion of 'family' 
 > > >> entirely." 
 > > > 
 > > >In other words, militant queers want it both ways - they want 
 "inclusion" 
 > > >into the same social institutions they are hell-bent on destroying. They 
 > > >sound just like the malcontent teenager who says he really doesn't want 
 > to 
 > > >go to the party, but wants an invitation so badly merely so he can 
 > disrupt 
 > > >it. :O| 
 > > > 
 > > Dim witted and nasty too -- a poisonous combination. 
 > > 
 > > Is it that you imagine that ALL Gays must have the SAME opinions? 
 > 
 > No. Do you consider my reference to "militant queers" equivalent to "all 
 > gays"? 
 > 
 > > Michael Signorile and I (for instance) have entirely divergent views 
 > > in the matter of marriage. 
 > > 
 > > Can you suppose that we have all subscribed to the :agenda" you fret 
 > > so over and we all toe the mark on every issue? 
 > > 
 > > Pathetic! 
 > 
 > What's "pathetic" is your demonstrably poor reading comprehension skill. 
 > Nowhere do I refer to all gays - you deliberately misread what I say so you 
 > can berate me about it. Fucking asshole (no pun intended...) 
  
 That sounds very like berating. 
  
 I don't understand Stan, are you saying that it's ok for you and 
 not someone else? Sounds like a double standard to me. 
  
 -- 
    Fritz 
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
    Taking back my freedom of conscience. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)