XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.california 
 From: jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au 
  
 On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 18:35:58 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality Ward 
 Stewart  wrote: 
  
 >| On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 13:45:56 GMT, Jeff North 
 >|  wrote: 
 >| 
 >| >On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 12:59:49 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality Lazer 
 >| >Sharp wrote: 
 >| > 
 >| >>| On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 09:19:20 GMT, Ward Stewart 
 >| >>|  wrote: 
 >| >>| 
 >| >>| >On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 03:40:49 GMT, "Stan de SD" 
 >| >>| > wrote: 
 >| >>| > 
 >| >>| >> 
 >| >>| >> wrote in message 
 >| >>| >>news:691e612a4442a03cb79256938e5af969@free.teranews.com... 
 >| >>| >>> 
 >| >>| >>> Even if homosexuals win the right to same-sex marriage, they will 
 >| >>| >>> continue to seek multiple partnerships. Homosexual Andrew Sullivan 
 is 
 >| >>| >>> the senior editor at The New Republic. In his book, Virtually 
 Normal, 
 >| >>| >>> Sullivan says that straight society will learn a lot from 
 homosexual 
 >| >>| >>> marriages if they are legalized. He notes that straights will 
 learn 
 to 
 >| >>| >>> have a greater "understanding of the need for extramarital outlets 
 >| >>| >>> between two men than between a man and a woman." In other words, 
 >| >>| >>> homosexuals have no intention of remaining monogamous to each 
 other. 
 >| >>| >>> Sullivan criticizes what he calls the "stifling model of 
 heterosexual 
 >| >>| >>> normality." 
 >| >>| >>> 
 >| >>| >>> Homosexual activist Michelangelo Signorile has openly called for 
 the 
 >| >>| >>> abolition of marriage and family as we know it. According to 
 >| >>| >>> Signorile, writing in Out magazine, homosexuals should "fight for 
 >| >>| >>> same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, 
 redefine 
 >| >>| >>> the institution of marriage completely. . . . to debunk the myth 
 and 
 >| >>| >>> radically alter an archaic institution. . . . The most subversive 
 >| >>| >>> action lesbians and gays can undertake--and one that would perhaps 
 >| >>| >>> benefit all of society--is to transform the notion of 'family' 
 >| >>| >>> entirely." 
 >| >>| >> 
 >| >>| >>In other words, militant queers want it both ways - they want 
 "inclusion" 
 >| >>| >>into the same social institutions they are hell-bent on destroying. 
 They 
 >| >>| >>sound just like the malcontent teenager who says he really doesn't 
 want to 
 >| >>| >>go to the party, but wants an invitation so badly merely so he can 
 disrupt 
 >| >>| >>it. :O| 
 >| >>| >> 
 >| >>| >Dim witted and nasty too -- a poisonous combination. 
 >| >>| > 
 >| >>| >Is it that you imagine that ALL Gays must have the SAME opinions? 
 >| >>| >Michael Signorile and I (for instance) have entirely divergent views 
 >| >>| >in the matter of marriage. 
 >| >>| 
 >| >>| Regardless your views, homosexuals in general are inherently 
 >| >>| promiscuous. That fact has been demonstrated many, many time. 
 >| > 
 >| >...and there is no such person as a promiscuous heterosexual? 
 >| 
 >| The promiscuity so vigorously deplored by the ignoramuses in this 
 >| forum is a characteristic of MALES - they fail to understand that the 
 >| word "homosexual" includes both males and females. 
  
 Ahh but lesbianism is perfectly ok, Ward. Just look at the sales of 
 lesbian porn, who is the biggest consumer - heterosexual males. 
 --------------------------------------------------------------- 
 jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au  : Remove your pants to reply 
 --------------------------------------------------------------- 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)