XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.california
From: standesd@earthlink.net
"Fritz" wrote in message
news:3F33EBE3.25B93C52@emuybcpl.net...
> Stan de SD wrote:
>
> > "Fritz" wrote in message
> > news:3F328F8D.B557AEC8@emuybcpl.net...
> > > Stan de SD wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Ward Stewart" wrote in message
> > > > news:jetuiv8ooi8cuis4cfoonak0sad0rmb1rk@4ax.com...
> > > > > On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 03:40:49 GMT, "Stan de SD"
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote in message
> > > > > >news:691e612a4442a03cb79256938e5af969@free.teranews.com...
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Even if homosexuals win the right to same-sex marriage, they
will
> > > > > >> continue to seek multiple partnerships. Homosexual Andrew
Sullivan
> > is
> > > > > >> the senior editor at The New Republic. In his book, Virtually
> > Normal,
> > > > > >> Sullivan says that straight society will learn a lot from
> > homosexual
> > > > > >> marriages if they are legalized. He notes that straights will
learn
> > to
> > > > > >> have a greater "understanding of the need for extramarital
outlets
> > > > > >> between two men than between a man and a woman." In other
words,
> > > > > >> homosexuals have no intention of remaining monogamous to each
> > other.
> > > > > >> Sullivan criticizes what he calls the "stifling model of
> > heterosexual
> > > > > >> normality."
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Homosexual activist Michelangelo Signorile has openly called
for
> > the
> > > > > >> abolition of marriage and family as we know it. According to
> > > > > >> Signorile, writing in Out magazine, homosexuals should "fight
for
> > > > > >> same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted,
redefine
> > > > > >> the institution of marriage completely. . . . to debunk the
myth
> > and
> > > > > >> radically alter an archaic institution. . . . The most
subversive
> > > > > >> action lesbians and gays can undertake--and one that would
perhaps
> > > > > >> benefit all of society--is to transform the notion of 'family'
> > > > > >> entirely."
> > > > > >
> > > > > >In other words, militant queers want it both ways - they want
> > "inclusion"
> > > > > >into the same social institutions they are hell-bent on
destroying.
> > They
> > > > > >sound just like the malcontent teenager who says he really
doesn't
> > want
> > > > to
> > > > > >go to the party, but wants an invitation so badly merely so he
can
> > > > disrupt
> > > > > >it. :O|
> > > > > >
> > > > > Dim witted and nasty too -- a poisonous combination.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it that you imagine that ALL Gays must have the SAME opinions?
> > > >
> > > > No. Do you consider my reference to "militant queers" equivalent to
"all
> > > > gays"?
> > > >
> > > > > Michael Signorile and I (for instance) have entirely divergent
views
> > > > > in the matter of marriage.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you suppose that we have all subscribed to the :agenda" you
fret
> > > > > so over and we all toe the mark on every issue?
> > > > >
> > > > > Pathetic!
> > > >
> > > > What's "pathetic" is your demonstrably poor reading comprehension
skill.
> > > > Nowhere do I refer to all gays - you deliberately misread what I say
so
> > you
> > > > can berate me about it. Fucking asshole (no pun intended...)
> > >
> > > That sounds very like berating.
> > >
> > > I don't understand Stan, are you saying that it's ok for you and
> > > not someone else? Sounds like a double standard to me.
> >
> > You can be the sick perverted fuck to your heart's content with another
> > consenting adult in your own home, and I really don't give a shit. Where
you
> > get yourselves into deep shit (again, no pun intended) is your fanatical
> > desire to force the rest of us to accept your "lifestyle choices" as
> > acceptable and desirable.
>
> Don't get so excited Stan, nobody is trying to force you to do any
> thing. It's more like you lot are trying to force gays to do things
> your way.
Hardly. But then again, you never did have a clue.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
