XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.california
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 05:14:49 GMT, David Davis
wrote:
>€
>
>Uncle, Bill, Paul wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 21:53:47 GMT, David Davis
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Uncle, Bill, Paul wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dating the Anti-Gay Backlash - Oval Office embraces homophobia
>> >
>> >Hardly sparky, even Bork says you are wrong.
>> >
>> >By Robert H. Bork
>> >
>> >"Many court watchers believe that within five to 10 years the U.S.
>> >Supreme Court will hold that there is a constitutional right to
>> >homosexual marriage, ... The chosen instrument will be the Equal
>> >Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. After all, if state law
>> >forbids Fred to marry Henry, aren't they denied equal protection
>> >when the law permits Tom and Jane to marry"?
>>
>> The fourteenth has absolutely no bearing on sexual orientation (read
>> it carefully and you will see what it refers to) and cannot be
>> wrenched into having any by even the most creative of homosexuals.
>
>So now Pimp Boy is sayng Judge Robert Bork the most conservative
>person on earth, outside of John Asscroft, is a creative homosexual.
>Been smoking too much crack?
>
>If a man can marry a woman, that same woman must have the right
>to marry a woman or her rights of equal protection and due process
>have been violated.
>
>> €
>>
>> You might pay particular attention to the narrative that says,
>>
>> "The Development of Substantive Due Process
>>
>> Although many years after ratification the Court ventured the not very
>> informative observation that the Fourteenth Amendment ''operates to
>> extend . . . the same protection against arbitrary state legislation,
>> affecting life, liberty and property, as is offered by the Fifth
>> Amendment,'' and that ''ordinarily if an act of Congress is valid
>> under the Fifth Amendment it would be hard to say that a state law in
>> like terms was void under the Fourteenth,'' 35 the significance of the
>> due process clause as a restraint on state action appears to have been
>> grossly underestimated by litigants no less than by the Court in the
>> years immediately following its adoption. From the outset of our
>> constitutional history due process of law as it occurs in the Fifth
>> Amendment had been recognized as a restraint upon government, but,
>> with the conspicuous exception of the Dred Scott decision, 36 only in
>> the narrower sense that a legislature must provide ''due process for
>> the enforcement of law.''
>
>Alexander Hamilton founder of the Federalist Party. Was a
>homosexual (bisexual)and€was a founding father, so much for
>the founders would object to homosexuality. Here is a letter
>between Hamilton to John Laurens:
>
>Cold in my professions, warm in my friendships, I wish, my Dear
>Laurens, it might be in my power, by action rather than words to
>convince you that I love you. I shall only tell you that 'til
>you bade us Adieu, I hardly knew the value you had taught my
>heart to set upon you. Indeed, my friend, it was not well done.
>You know the opinion I entertain of mankind, and how much it is
>my desire to preserve myself free from particular attachments,
>and to keep my happiness independent of the caprice of others.
>You should not have taken advantage of my sensibility to steal
>into my affections without my consent. But as you have done it,
>and as we are generally indulgent to those we love, I shall
>not scruple to pardon the fraud you have committed, on condition
>that for my sake, if not for your own, you will always continue
>to merit the partiality, which you have artfully instilled into me.
Play that banjo,Georgia Deliverance Boy! Hahahahaha! Aren't you the
same fruit cake who swore that your research for a high school term
paper lead to the discovery that proved that Abraham Lincoln was a
hermaphrodite? (as I recall that one almost got you laughed out of APH
BY THE QUEERS!) Now you say old Al Hamilton,is a pervert too! Damn
sounds like maybe the CC was nothing more than queer circle jerk!
(According to you of course...)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|