
| Msg # 1695 of 1954 on ZZNY4434, Thursday 9-28-22, 9:09 |
| From: DGS |
| To: NYC XYZ |
| Subj: Re: "Don't judge by, " whatever |
XPost: alt.beer
From: dgs1300@hotmail.com
NYC XYZ wrote:
> Yes yes I know I'm just basing my opinions on stereotypes...
Yep. A little lame, too, without the benefit of experience. Even
within a given country, there can be a range of experiences. The pub
and drinking culture in, say, Munich, is quite different from the pub
and drinking culture in Bamberg, yet both are cities in the German state
of Bavaria.
> but there
> just isn't the same "reverence" for alcohol in some cultures as opposed
> to others...
It isn't about "reverence." It's about traditions, whether developed
over a very long time - as in much of Europe - or adopted more recently
by settlers from elsewhere, as in North America.
> China is only, unfortunately, just adopting a "bar culture"
> now, but still casual conversation is about good places to eat, not
> good places to get blasted (which I would agree may mostly be an
> American phenomenon).
East Asians like the Chinese don't have similar drinking traditions as
the West for a variety of reasons. One of them is that excessive
drinking is frowned upon, partly because the same genetics that give
most eastern Asian native peoples their appearance also contribute to
how they process alcohol. Nearly half of all have a mutation in the
gene for aldehyde dehydrogenase, for instance, and this has an effect
on how their bodies process alcohol.
> So I'm not talking "descriptively" as much as "culturally"...
Cultures vary. You might, for instance, note that there is a rather
significant proportion of the earth's peoples who have virtually no
alcohol tradition at all, due to religious proscriptions.
> I
> certainly don't mean that I'd bet money any given Irishman is a drunk
> compared to any, say, Korean
To even consider that, you'd have to look at rates of alcoholism and
compare between the two countries (and cultures). Fact is, per-capita
alcohol consumption in Ireland is substantially higher, particularly
when it comes to beer drinking. Per capita, Ireland is one of the top
ten beer-drinking nations in the world. China and Korea aren't any-
where near the top ten, and even if beer consumption continues to
increase in China, it will probably never be a top-ten per-capita
consumer. (Aggregate consumption is another story, as should be
expected given a population of 1.2 billion.)
Got Google?
> or some African, say (is alcoholic consumption
> "revered" in any of those cultures?)...
Some African cultures have their own indigenous traditional fermented
beverages, but they're not very well-known outside their home
territories.
> all I mean is that Jack
> Daniel's, Budweiser, etc., probably do more business per capita in
> northwestern Europe than they do elsewhere, for "cultural" reasons....
Um, no. The likes of JD & Bud do more business per capita in North
America than anywhere else. The Europeans have plenty of their own
local brands to consume, although Bud does a fair bit of business in
the UK and Ireland. If you go into a bar in Germany or Austria and
see a "Budweiser" beer on the list, it's the one from the Czech
Republic. The Anheuser-Busch product is considered a useful beverage
for those who don't actually like the taste of beer.
> Anyway, another thing I've noticed which seems a bit odd is that places
> with hot climates tend to serve the spicest cuisines...
*sigh* And when the Europeans first stumbled upon the Americas, they
found people eating things like tomatoes, various varieties of peppers
(capsicums), potatoes, and maize ("corn").
> now I
> understand, of course, that may spices originated in more tropical
> locales...
Um, gee, like, duh?
> but still, even these days, I think an European thinks
> "spice" means "black ground pepper" -- so to speak.
Which "European" would this be? The Brits have taken Indian-style
curry as one of their own, so, no, they don't just think "spice" means
"black ground pepper." There are other European cultures with similar
indigenous flavors, but as you go farther north, plant varieties start
to diminish. Wotta surprise, eh? You can't easily grow, say, cumin
and cinnamon spices in cool climates, but it isn't hard to grow, say,
fennel and caraway.
> It seems that the
> countries with the "richest" or "most varied" cuisines are in hotter
> climes, and those which employ spices a whole lot more.
Gee, that wouldn't have anything to do with that fact that those are,
generally, *indigenous* ingredients, would they, and that hotter
climates *sometimes* encourage the growth of a wider range of
harvestable food plants?
> Any good history of food books to recommend?
Hey, lookie! That Google thingie again!
|
328,121 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca