XPost: alt.activism, nyc.general, nyc.politics 
  
 On Mon, 02 May 2005 18:14:59 GMT, slim  wrote: 
  
 > 
 > 
 >wbt@privacy.net wrote: 
 >> 
 >> On Mon, 02 May 2005 02:21:32 GMT, slim  wrote: 
 >> 
 >> > 
 >> > 
 >> >wbt@privacy.net wrote: 
 >> >> 
 >> >> > 
 >> >> >99.9% of the people that attend these events go to exercise their 
 First 
 >> >> >Amendment right to free expression, and for that alone. Their rights 
 under 
 >> >> >our Constitution are FAR MORE important than preventing a fool or two 
 from 
 >> >> >being destructive, and the police can handle these few without denying 
 the 
 >> >> >others their rights and freedoms. 
 >> >> > 
 >> >> >The fact that some wear and tear on PUBLIC property is inevitable from 
 the 
 >> >> >use of such property by the public is NO EXCUSE to deny the people the 
 uses 
 >> >> >to which they are entitled. Public parks are NOT botanical gardens. 
 >> >> > 
 >> >> >Nice try, but you'll have to find a better rationalization for your 
 fascist 
 >> >> >attitudes. 
 >> >> 
 >> >> The rationalization is really not difficult for those with at least a 
 >> >> high school education: "It is not incumbent on the many to tolerate 
 >> >> the barbaric behavior of the few." Freedom of speech and assembly is 
 >> >> not a license to, and you haven't the fundamental right to  damage or 
 >> >> destroy public (THE PEOPLE'S) property regardless of your motive. 
 >> >> 
 >> >> Wake up and smell the newly mown grass, boy. 
 >> > 
 >> >What documanted damage and destruction are you referring to? 
 >> 
 >> Review the original post and then try to keep up, Slim (& petite.) 
 > 
 >Normal wear and tear. 
  
 Tear? Yes, I suppose so -- the leftist liberal anti-Americans "crying" 
 their asses off because they don't get special treatment. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)