XPost: alt.government.abuse, nyc.general, nyc.politics 
 From: liberty@once.net 
  
 "Phil"  wrote in message 
 news:9k85tvse8d3ek9dk5q0pl0jsjov5vtv7bd@4ax.com... 
 > On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 23:30:15 GMT, "Freedom Fighter"  
 > wrote: 
 > 
 > >> Walker was a liberal and a playboy.  He resigned in disgrace in 1932 
 > >> after being charged with corruption. 
 > > 
 > >Sounds like a KKKon$ervative to me. 
 > 
 > You're painting with broad strokes here, FF. 
  
 Perhaps, but the KKKon$ervatives are by far the most corrupt and 
 hypocritical among the present political scenario. 
  
 > >Being a fun-loving playboy requires the freedom of spirit typical of the 
 > >liberal. Though there have been corrupt people across the entire 
 political 
 > >spectrum, in general liberals cannot approach the likes of Nixswine, 
 > >Ghouliani and their ilk for hypocrisy and corruption. 
 > 
 > I suggest you look up Jimmy Walker.  There was a little more to him 
 > than being a playboy. 
 > 
 > >> You're going to blame a liberal's prejudice on being a conservative 
 > >> hypocrite?  Is it a law somewhere that liberals can't be bigots? 
 > > 
 > >By definition, liberalism excludes bigotry, particularly racial bigotry. 
 > >Ever hear of a liberal member of the KKK or other White Supremacist 
 group, 
 > >or of any racist group for that matter? 
 > 
 > How about Senator Robert Byrd? 
  
 I'm not all that familiar with him - what makes him a "liberal," and how is 
 he a racist? As I said, the terms are mutually exclusive. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)