home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZNE4432             news.groups.questions             4021 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 4016 of 4021 on ZZNE4432, Saturday 5-12-23, 11:57  
  From: EVGENII SPUTNIK  
  To: ALL  
  Subj: I'm trying to understand how UseNet real  
 XPost: alt.config, news.groups 
 From: 3477439268970071esputnikeo1@3477439268970071gmail.com 
  
 Hello UseNet, Hello Adam. 
  
 As you may already know, I created alt.comp.google and 
 alt.free.mailservers at 2007. 
 First newsgroup is useful, but it hurts comp.internet.services.google. 
 Making it two newsgroups about the same company. Isn't that too much? 
 Second - alt.free.mailservers - worked for some time, but now I think it's 
 time to remove this newsgroup. 
  
 So I have a question for all alt.*. 
 How you remove newsgroups? 
  
 Because I'm not very clean person, but things come to my home. 
 Things also live my home when it's garbage. 
 That's how life made. 
 In Big-8 hierarchy, garbage are removed when needed. 
  
 What you do in alt.*, people? Live in this garbage like those homeless 
 people I've seen on TV? Not if I'm against their lifestyle or traditions 
 of alt.config, I'm really trying to understand - how to delete a newsgroup 
 in alt.*. 
 How to remove two newsgroups I created while opposed by Adam Kerman and 
 most others, because now there are no more need in it? 
 It was created both by occasion - I have been in Belgium and had an ISP's 
 newsserver allowing unlimited control messages. 
  
 Now about present things. 
 I want Fedora newsgroup. 
 It won't be popular. 
 It won't be useless. 
  
 But one day Fedora may die. We everyone die one day, distros also can die, 
 unfortunately. 
 Then what? Fedora newsgroup would live like os2 newsgroups? Being garbage 
 on ftp.isc.org - UseNet part of, newsservers, search engines, Google 
 Groups, binary UseNet providers...? 
  
 Do you clean your garbage at all at alt.* or your philosophy that it is 
 history, and newsgroup should never be removed if been used for some time? 
 I understand, it's great to have archives. But isn't better to close 
 newsgroup for posting and save archives, Google still retains them? Isn't 
 UseNet better when newsgroup sometimes are being cremated rather than left 
 without any care on the battlefield of the UseNet servers and users? I 
 believe newsgroups should be like people - born and die. How to kill alt.* 
 zombies? No way? Really? 
 If so, would creating alt.os.linux.fedora hurt ecology of the Internet? 
 With bots, dead profiles, do we need another newsgroup that would be 
 nothing as a written till the end school diary which were better burned 
 when the year of Fedora will come to end? I ASK YOU, USENET! Don't just 
 use - think! 
  
 -- 
     Sputnik ================= == === ===== ====== ======== = ============ 
      See news.groups.proposals if you think Fedora deserves a newsgroup! 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,081 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca