From: nomail@please.com
Thanks for the quick response. I was hoping there was something more of
a tool or mechanism in place, like Yahoo Groups has. But I know the
mechanics of Usenet and hoped there was something a bit more
sophisticalted in place. I could just go and set it up on Yahoo, but I
wanted the wider audience.
Ahh, decisions. Now where to go... Thanks for the answer....
Dave
Don Aitken wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2005 14:01:37 -0400, Dave R wrote:
>
>
>>I am writing a proposal for a new group, and would like it to be
>>moderated such that I, or the designated moderator can either disallow,
>>or remove postings inappropriate for the newsgroup.
>>
>>How would one do this? I'm using Thunderbird as my newsreader, but what
>>is the process by which a posting can either be pulled by a moderator,
>>or rejected outright?
>>
>
> You need to either do some reading up on the subject of how moderation
> works, or find somebody who knows the technicalities and can be
> persuaded to come on board as co-proponent or technical consultants.
> It can get quite complicated; this is a simplified outline. Moderated
> groups are set up so that messages which users post to the group are
> not, in fact, posted at all. Instead they are *emailed* to an address
> belonging to the moderators. The moderators then either post them, or
> not. The minumum you need is a secure reliable email address, which
> can cope with *lots* of spam, which it *will* get, and a newclient
> which enables you to add the "Approved:" header. Plus a willingness to
> cope with the unreasonable demands of the group's users, 27/7,
> forever. It helps *a lot* to use good moderation software, of which
> there is a fair amount out there, although it usually requires some
> technical knowledge to use it. Such systems are available for Windows
> machines, but the best ones (and, I think, all of the free ones) are
> for Linux.
>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|