home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZNE4432             news.groups.questions             4021 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 356 of 4021 on ZZNE4432, Sunday 5-13-23, 4:46  
  From: JACKSANDERS  
  To: ALL  
  Subj: PROOF THAT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER WAS DE  
 XPost: alt.news, aus.news, aus.science 
 XPost: nz.politics, nz.rec, nz.soc 
 XPost: sci.engr.civil, sci.research.postdoc, sci.space.history 
 From: Jack.S@fresnomail.com 
  
 PROOF THAT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER WAS DELIBERATELY DEMOLISHED. 
  
 EVIDENCE: BOTH OF THE TOWERS FELL IN ABOUT 10 SECONDS. 
  
 PROOF: 
  
 All that one needs to know, to be able to conclusively prove that the Twin 
 Towers were demolished, 
 is that the towers fell in roughly 10 seconds, that is, that they fell at 
 about the same rate that 
 an object falls through air. 
  
 Anyone with a little common sense will realize that the top of a building 
 does 
 not pass through the 
 concrete and steel that comprises the lower portion of the building at the 
 same rate that it falls 
 through air. This just doesn't happen, unless, of course, the lower part of 
 the building has lost 
 its structural integrity (and this is usually due to the detonation of a 
 multitude of small 
 explosive charges as seen in controlled demolitions). 
  
 The fact that the towers collapsed in about 10 seconds is a statement that 
 the 
 upper portion of each 
 of the towers passed through the lower portion at about the same rate that 
 it 
 would have fallen 
 through air. The fact that the towers fell this quickly (essentially at the 
 rate of free-fall) is 
 conclusive evidence that they were deliberately demolished. 
  
 Believing that there is nothing wrong with the towers collapsing so quickly, 
 is roughly analogous to 
 believing that people pass through closed doors as quickly as they pass 
 through open doors. 
  
 The fact that they fell at such a rate means that they encountered 
 essentially 
 no resistance from 
 the supposedly undamaged parts of the structure. That is, no resistance was 
 encountered from any of 
 the immensely strong parts of the structure that had held the building up 
 for 
 the last 30 years. 
 From this one can conclude that the lower undamaged parts were actually very 
 damaged (probably by 
 the detonation of a multitude of small explosive charges as is usual in a 
 controlled demolition). 
  
 http://members.fortunecity.com/911/ 
 http://911review.org/Wget/members.fortunecity.com/911 
 http://cooperativeresearch.net/phorum5/list.php?3 
 http://guardian.150m.com 
 http://guardian.250free.com 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,124 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca