From: jkorpela@cs.tut.fi 
  
 Black Dragon  wrote: 
  
 > Anyway, the FACT is, it was *YOU* who started with the "name 
 > calling", 
  
 No, it was you. There is a difference between calling something a lie 
 and somebody a liar. I don't expect you to know that, but now you have 
 proven that you _are_ a coward, who keeps blaming a specific person 
 (falsely, in fact) in public, yourself hiding behind a fake name and a 
 forged address. 
  
 > I also have valid reasons for posting anonymously. 
  
 That's what you say. What we can _see_ is that you use anonymity to 
 (falsely) accuse people in public. 
  
 > But since you 
 > /refuse/ to discuss the X-No-Archive issue 
  
 Either you have serious problems in understanding or remembering recent 
 events, or you lie, or you manage to express yourself very foolishly. 
  
 I have discussed the X-No-Archive in quite some detail, and listed some 
 of the damage caused by them, _and you responded to that_ (never mind 
 _what_ you responded - you cannot claim that you simply didn't read what 
 I wrote about the X-No-Archive issue). 
  
 Not all people who use fake From fields use them for purposes like false 
 accusations towards a person. But the mere possibility of sliding to such 
 behavior (or even giving the impression of doing so) should deter anyone 
 but the saints from using fake name on Usenet (and the saints naturally 
 wouldn't even think of using fake names). 
  
 -- 
 Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/ 
   Usenet guides and essays: http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/ 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)