From: pack-news@rattus.net 
  
 Woodchuck Bill  writes: 
  
 > Matt Austern  wrote in news:m2llffyljv.fsf@Matt-Austerns- 
 > Computer.local: 
 > 
 > > One 
 > > reason I don't expect this group to be popular is the confusing name; 
 > > I suspect that very few of the people who want to talk about the 
 > > cameras that would theoretically be on-topic in that group have any 
 > > idea of what "zlr" means. 
 > 
 > That name was only a starting point. Got anything better? 
  
 rec.photo.digital.advanced 
  
 For interested in advanced digital photography techniques, whatever the 
 hell those are, and 
  
 rec.photo.digital.slr 
  
 for discussions of digital-slr-specific hardware stuff such as lenses 
 and body choices, very DSLR specific flashes, and cleaning sensors. 
  
 Would work, but the inherent elitism of the DSLR users will of course 
 prevent them accepting this :) 
  
 B> 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)