From: pack-news@rattus.net 
  
 John McWilliams  writes: 
  
 > Bruce Murphy wrote: 
 > 
 > > John McWilliams  writes: 
 > > 
 > >>Charles stated it well. I don't know why you insist on hammering on an 
 > >>elusive definition and a subject that most folks have moved on from. 
 > > If it was a 'definition that photo enthusiasts use' then there would 
 > > be a significant number of people toting 'SLRs' that had 
 > > interchangebale lenses but were not in fact SLRs. Are you aware of 
 > > this? 
 > 
 > I'm not talking about a defintion you- and, at one point, Lionel used, 
 > perhaps one or two others. 
 > 
 > What, exactly, would you have me "become" aware of? 
  
 I want to know if you are aware of the precise case that your 
 acceptance of this definition would indicate should exist. Hence my 
 construct 'are you aware of this?'. Are you? 
  
 > > I'm going to keep at this because since the proponents seem to be 
 > > elitist and uncommnicative bastards, this appears to be the only way 
 > > to get things fixed in thhe charters. 
 > > 
 > 
 > And if you still don't get your way are you going to flame them even 
 > more? Flood the group? Become more insulting? Or just maybe more 
 > judgemental.- yeah, that's the ticket..... 
  
 Well, they consistently refused to even discuss the crossposting 
 issue, but after having pointed it out many dozen times in as many 
 different ways, they /eventually/ (mostly) fixed the proposed charter. 
  
 As that appears to be the only means of communication with them, what 
 option do I have on the remaining problems with the RFD. 
  
 B> 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)