XPost: rec.photo.digital 
  
 In news.groups Gisle Hannemyr  wrote: 
  
 > Should rangefinder and zlr material be on topic or not?  I don't 
 > care.  I would vote for a "rec.photo.digital.slr" if discussions 
 > about rangefinders and zlrs where included - and I would vote for a 
 > "rec.photo.digital.slr" if they by charter are relegated to the 
 > existing "catch-all" group ("rec.photo.digital") - and I would even 
 > vote for a "rec.photo.digital.slr" charter that skirted the issue 
 > entirely by not mentioning rangefinders and zlrs at all. 
  
 > But I will vote /against/ the creation of two new zombie groups, 
 > even if that stops "rec.photo.digital.slr" (which is a new group 
 > I want and think merits creation) from being created. 
  
 As far as I'm aware, the votes will be separate.  I intend to vote YES 
 to slr-systems and NO to rangefinders (which don't really exist), NO 
 to zlrs (because I don't think they need a new group) and abstain on 
 P&S (which is the meat 'n potatoes of r.p.d.) 
  
 Andrew. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)