From: bwr607@hotmail.com 
  
 "Richard Henry"  wrote in 
 news:B451d.32204$9Y5.28445@fed1read02: 
  
 > 
 > "Ken Arromdee"  wrote in message 
 > news:ci2h45$2da$3@blue.rahul.net... 
 >> In article <9as8k0ds8fhpr9bol2hagvj57ang0oaklj@4ax.com>, 
 >> Lionel   wrote: 
 >> >Remove the stuff about the affirmation, & only permit votes from 
 >> >people who can show that they actually post to newsgroups relevant 
 >> >to the CFV, & I think it'd almost eliminate voting fraud. (Not to 
 >> >mention being a hell of a lot fairer to the likely users of the 
 >> >proposed group.) 
 >> 
 >> So if someone proposes soc.culture.kikes, I wouldn't be allowed to 
 >> vote 
 > "no" 
 >> because I don't post to any relevant newsgroup?  What if someone 
 >> proposed 
 > a 
 >> newsgroup for child pornography--could anyone vote "no" on that? 
 > 
 > Are you saying there are no child porn newsgroups? 
  
 I haven't seen any in the Big-8..thank goodness. 
  
  
  
 -- 
 Bill 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)