From: arromdee@green.rahul.net 
  
 In article <9as8k0ds8fhpr9bol2hagvj57ang0oaklj@4ax.com>, 
 Lionel   wrote: 
 >Remove the stuff about the affirmation, & only permit votes from people 
 >who can show that they actually post to newsgroups relevant to the CFV, 
 >& I think it'd almost eliminate voting fraud. (Not to mention being a 
 >hell of a lot fairer to the likely users of the proposed group.) 
  
 So if someone proposes soc.culture.kikes, I wouldn't be allowed to vote "no" 
 because I don't post to any relevant newsgroup?  What if someone proposed a 
 newsgroup for child pornography--could anyone vote "no" on that? 
 -- 
        Ken Arromdee / arromdee_AT_rahul.net / http://www.rahul.net/arromdee 
  
 "They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the 
 Wright 
 brothers.  But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown." --Carl Sagan 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)