From: rphenry@home.com 
  
 "Ken Arromdee"  wrote in message 
 news:ci2h45$2da$3@blue.rahul.net... 
 > In article <9as8k0ds8fhpr9bol2hagvj57ang0oaklj@4ax.com>, 
 > Lionel   wrote: 
 > >Remove the stuff about the affirmation, & only permit votes from people 
 > >who can show that they actually post to newsgroups relevant to the CFV, 
 > >& I think it'd almost eliminate voting fraud. (Not to mention being a 
 > >hell of a lot fairer to the likely users of the proposed group.) 
 > 
 > So if someone proposes soc.culture.kikes, I wouldn't be allowed to vote 
 "no" 
 > because I don't post to any relevant newsgroup?  What if someone proposed 
 a 
 > newsgroup for child pornography--could anyone vote "no" on that? 
  
 Are you saying there are no child porn newsgroups? 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)