From: pack-news@rattus.net 
  
 Jeremy Nixon  writes: 
  
 > Bruce Murphy   wrote: 
 > 
 > > But you wanted to include rangefinders becasue they were high end. You 
 > > wanted to exclude SLRs without completely interchangeable lenses 
 > > because they're not flexible enough, except that things which /have/ 
 > > extra lenses don't count because they're 'low end' 
 > 
 > It's not about "ends".  "Ends" have absolutely nothing to do with it. 
 > 
 > It's about how the cameras are used and, more to the point, how they are 
 > discussed.  A camera that is technically an SLR but has a fixed lens is 
 > in the same category as the "ZLR" cameras with regard to how they are 
 > used and discussed.  It just plain, flat-out makes no sense to include 
 > them in the "SLR" group.  Almost nothing in that group will be of value 
 > to the owners of those cameras. 
  
 Then what, apart from the obvious lens choice and sensor cleaning, do 
 you think will be in this group? 
  
 B> 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)