From: robert.mcclenon@verizon.net 
  
 On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 18:19:12 -0000, Andrew - Supernews 
  wrote: 
  
 >On 2004-09-09, Woodchuck Bill  wrote: 
 >> Andrew - Supernews  wrote in 
 >> news:slrnck13vt.2j33.andrew+nonews@trinity.supernews.net: 
 >> 
 >>> Please identify the specific posts you believe are forged. 
 >>> 
 >>> I guarantee you that at least some of the "Guy Macon" posts recently 
 >>> appearing in news.groups were posted from google, because I have 
 >>> transit logs showing them arriving here from google with nothing else 
 >>> in the path. 
 >> 
 >> It is unfortunate that someone has been using Guy's good name to post this 
 >> nonsense. But..are they considered forgeries if the e-mail address is 
 >> different from Guy's? Wouldn't this series of abusive posts be considered 
 >> "froggery"? Still abuse, however. 
 > 
 >Arthur Rubin claimed that some of the posts were forging _google_ as the 
 >origin site; that's what I was referring to. 
  
 Do you have any evidence that any of the posts that claim to be from 
 Google are not from Google? 
  
      - -    Bob McClenon 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)