From: robert.mcclenon@verizon.net 
  
 On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 16:52:34 -0700, Brian Mailman 
  wrote: 
  
 >Bard wrote: 
 > 
 >> On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 21:14:52 +0000 (UTC), ru.igarashi@usask.ca wrote: 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>>>RATIONALE: soc.religion.satanism 
 >>> 
 >>>This should be named talk.religion.satanism, if it is not going to 
 >>>be moderated. 
 >>> 
 >> 
 >> I disagree that a  s.r.* has to be moderated s.r.quakers is not 
 >> according to another poster. 
 > 
 >Minor nit... srq is _self-moderated_.  That is, they are disciplined in 
 >their responses. 
 > 
 >The proponent of this RFD has not responded on how, should this group 
 >pass, the issues that usually make it necessary to to moderate a s.r.* 
 >group will be dealt with so this group can be unmoderated. 
 > 
 >B/ 
  
 Self-moderation is actually moderation by the Inner Light (the Quaker 
 term for the Holy Spirit).  That doesn't prevent non-Quakers from 
 trolling the group, because they aren't disciplined by the Inner 
 Light, but it does enable the Quakers to ignore the trolls. 
  
 I agree that the proponent has not explained how the issues that 
 usually require moderation will be addressed. 
  
      - -     Bob McClenon 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)