
| Msg # 31926 of 32000 on ZZNE4431, Saturday 5-12-23, 2:24 |
| From: THAD |
| To: ECM |
| Subj: Re: 4th RFD: rec.photo.digital reorganiz |
XPost: rec.photo.digital From: black_boxer_briefs@yahoo.com ECM wrote: > > I still think that different names should be considered (not that I'm > doing any better picking names....), something that a newbie or tyro > could recognize and say "oh yeah, I belong THERE". There's going to be > a lot of confused cross-posting and off-topic stuff if people don't > understand the names of the groups. Or, they'll just ignore the new > groups and continue to post to the parent group. Rec.photo.digital will continue to remain very popular. It is not the intentions of any of the proponents to kill the parent group. It will, however, give users the option of participating in a forum that focuses on issues more common to their camera - with beginners, intermediate, and advanced users of that camera type in each group. Newbies will probably find RPD first. Perhaps owners of digital SLR systems, digital rangefinders, or any of the other categories might immediately recognize which group is appropriate. If not, they will figure it out. -- Thaddeus Lipshitz --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,075 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca