XPost: rec.photo.digital, rec.photo.equipment.35mm
"Jeremy Nixon" wrote
> Thad wrote:
>> REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
> Has this now become The Proposal That Must Please Everyone, Even
> People Who Have No Interest In The Originally Proposed Group?
Apparently not, as I'm not happy :(
What a joke, they call it a reorg and ignore the 2 most important groups.
>> unmoderated group rec.photo.digital.rangefinder
> This is truly silly. The total number of models of digital rangefinder
> cameras in existence is zero. That's going to be one lively group.
> What happened to letting them hang out in the SLR group until
> there's any kind of need for a group of their own? Like, say,
> sometime after there actually *are* any such cameras?
I think they're planning on playing 'dodge the troll' ;)
get enough groups, da sekret hand shake, they be in there
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|