XPost: rec.photo.digital, rec.photo.equipment.35mm 
  
 "Jeremy Nixon"  wrote 
  
 > Steve Young  wrote: 
  
 >> Apparently not, as I'm not happy :( 
  
 > What about? 
  
 Not fixing 2 pertinent charters along the way 
 Then having the gall to call it a reorg 
  
 >> What a joke, they call it a reorg and ignore the 2 most important 
 >> groups. 
  
 > The two most important groups in rec.photo.digital?  There aren't two 
 > groups there at all. 
  
 The 2 groups germane to these proposals, i.e. rpd & rpe35 
 That's where most of the photo people speaking here are from. 
 I believe 35mm is home to the founding proponent/(s) 
 Both groups are listed for the CFV. 
  
 :)x 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)