| Msg # 31838 of 32000 on ZZNE4431, Saturday 5-12-23, 2:23 |
| From: CHARLES |
| To: BLACK_BOXER_BRIEFS@YAHOO. |
| Subj: Re: 4th RFD: rec.photo.digital reorganiz |
From: fort@his.com.remove.invalid
In article <2q9j0mFrq7foU1@uni-berlin.de>, Thad
wrote:
> Each proposed group will have its own YES/NO section on the ballot. If
I don't see the point in proposing a group that is premature to exist.
Also I dislike your change of the proposed name of the proposed slr
group. It seems like you are so stubborn in your slr has to have
interchangable lens thesis that you have mucked up the proposal.
--
Charles
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
328,080 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca