From: phil@panix.com 
  
 Thad  writes: 
 >Jeremy Nixon wrote: 
 > 
 >> Well, in fairness, there are more "specialty" digital cameras in the form 
 >> of CCD/telescopes than there are digital rangefinder cameras, and yet, 
 >> for some bizarre reason, a group is now being proposed for those. 
 > 
 >Each proposed group will have its own YES/NO section on the ballot. If 
 >any of these proposed groups fail, that will indicate that there is not 
 >enough interest to create such a group at this time. If anyone wants to 
 >propose another group for specialty cameras, or any other cameras that 
 >may have been left out, e-mail me the proposal and I will discuss it 
 >with the other five proponents for consideration. 
 > 
 The specialty users will likely be more interested in the specialty 
 than the photography.  We already have sci.astro.ccd-imaging. 
  
 Ph. 
  
 -- 
 "We are all Bayesians at heart, but when it comes to actions in this 
  world their approach, which at times may be the only one available, 
  leaves much to be desired."   R. W. Hamming     
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)