XPost: rec.photo.digital, rec.photo.equipment.35mm
"Lionel" wrote in message
news:7slvj05mrnbqgrqfa04i5f94hsg062jj74@4ax.com...
> Kibo informs me that "Steve Young" stated
> that:
>>Not fixing 2 pertinent charters along the way
>>Then having the gall to call it a reorg
> Seeing as you're the only person in the universe who thinks that those
> charters need to be rewritten, you better get off your lazy arse &
> rewrite them, instead of trying to bully people who think your ideas are
> useless into doing the work for you. Besides, it'd give you something
> constructive to do with the time you currently waste on running your
> Dizum & Google sock-puppets.
hahaha, Full Metal Jacket, very clever Lionel
How long did it take you to do it??
So what's your preference for a new group name to replace
rec.photo.digital? do you like one or 2 misc.
Mayhaps 3 for good measure?
That's it, rec.photo.digital.misc.misc.misc. perdy spiffy stuff, huh?
Then we'd be able to do a rmgroup to get rid of that nasty old charter,
with holes like swiss cheese.
Wow! Think we can muster the gumption to do the same for 35mm?
I know Alan is on record saying he'd like a new charter :)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|