
| Msg # 31789 of 32000 on ZZNE4431, Saturday 5-12-23, 2:22 |
| From: THAD |
| To: EDWARD OHARE |
| Subj: Re: rec.photo.digital.multi-lens |
From: black_boxer_briefs@yahoo.com edward ohare wrote: > Make the Charter match slr or adopt multilens and leave the Charter > alone. The reason I say best to date isn't good enough is that it > appears there is substantial opposition to the group as proposed. Multi-lens is not a good match at all. An SLR only takes one lens at a time (though add-on elements may be added - and they almost always degrade the performance of the final image to some degree). The proposed group is about digital SLR systems - not "multilenses" - whatever that could possibly mean. A camera witha zoom lens that cannot be removed is not an "SLR system" either. An SLR system is a series of related bodies and lenses that share a common mount. As Woodchuck Bill indicated in a recent post, have a look at the next RFD. You are arguing a series of moot points - not to sound rude, or anything. -- Thaddeus Lipshitz --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,098 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca