From: igopogo@ix.netcom.com 
  
 Andy Dingley  wrote in 
 news:hvcsj0h8aj53pn1bogffcb7maek9ru8d18@4ax.com: 
  
 > On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 20:49:01 +0000 (UTC), John McCoy 
 >  wrote: 
 > 
 >>Wow.  "Split the group" was an old, tired idea back when I first 
 >>started reading the wreck (1993), but this is the first time I 
 >>recall anyone actually trying to do it. 
 > 
 > I've long been in favour of splitting the group (we already have 
 > turning and carving separate), but that would be _splitting_ it, to 
 > categorise it and make the volume more manageable.  This is just 
 > duplication, and pointless. 
  
 I agree this current idea lacks merit. 
  
 The issue that's always come up with splitting the wreck is deciding 
 on a sensible division point (or points).  Turning & carving each had 
 a fairly clean line of seperation, but no-one's ever been able to come 
 up with any other widely accepted divisions. 
  
 John 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)