XPost: rec.photo.digital 
 From: alan.browne@FreeLunchVideotron.ca 
  
 Arthur L. Rubin wrote: 
  
 > On the other hand, excluding things which are actually 
 > SLRs because they are not commonly thought to be SLRs 
 > is equally futile.  IMHO, the current proposal suffers 
 > from both of these defects. 
  
 Such as?  "SLR-like" is not an SLR. 
  
 -- 
 -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: 
 -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm 
 -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.-- 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)