XPost: rec.photo.digital 
  
 "Thad"  wrote 
  
 > Steve Young wrote: 
 > 
 >> Dittos! My wish too, but I won't compromise on conforming the affected 
 >> groups charters. The only reply I will have for this apparent 'hit and 
 >> run' pillage is my resolve to vote 'no'. 
 > 
 > You are being very unreasonable. You are asking for something for which 
 > there is no process. 
  
 In spite of the hundreds of posts, and even Alan saying it was needed, 
 neither of you have been apparently willing to ask (and accommodate), if 
 it could be included with your proposal. It sure makes a lot of sense, 
 especially when you're going to be asking the 2 affected groups to 'vote 
 in' your new group. 
  
 :)x 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)