XPost: rec.photo.digital 
  
 In news.groups Alan Browne  wrote: 
 > andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid wrote: 
  
 >> I'm not arguing against the inclusion of digital rangefinders, BTW. 
 >> I understand why you want to include them, even if it is a bit odd 
 >> given the name of the group.  But omitting a class of digital SLR 
 >> cameras in a group called "dslr" is, to say the least, illogical. 
 >> At worst, it is snobbish. 
  
 > Andrew, you do not seem to understand why an SLR-like camera is 
 > not an SLR.  I can't help you beyond the commonly used definition 
 > and that which is in the proposal. 
  
 Accusing your opponent of "failing to understand" is rather pathetic. 
 I understand quite well, as do you.  However, we do not agree. 
  
 Andrew. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)