From: weedfam@youhoo.com 
  
 Robert McClenon wrote: 
 > 
 > On 27 Aug 2004 21:22:15 GMT, Woodchuck Bill  
 > wrote: 
 > 
 > >bazza@darkforces.com (James Bazza) wrote in news:1093630883.18593@isc.org: 
 > > 
 > >>                      REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD) 
 > >>                unmoderated group soc.religion.satanism 
 > > 
 > > 
 > >Hello James. Someone will probably flame me for this, but here goes 
 anyway. 
 > 
 > Any discussion of Satanism is likely to lead to flames. 
 > 
 > > 
 > >The concept of Satanism strikes me as inherently evil. For the sake of 
 > >Usenet as a whole, I don't think creation of such a group would be a good 
 > >idea. There is already an alt group for this, and it doesn't seem to be 
 > >very popular. This could be due to lack of propagation, I wouldn't know. 
 > > 
 > >My 2 cents. Take it with a grain of salt. 
 > 
 > As a Catholic Christian, I am not sure that the concept of Satanism is 
 > evil, because I am not sure what Satanism is, or what it has to do 
 > with any particular Christian (or Muslim) concept of Satan. 
 > 
 >      - -     Bob McClenon 
  
 Considering that it was a creation of Christianity, perhaps you 
 should look into what your scriptures have to say on the topic. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)