XPost: rec.photo.digital
From: jeremy@exit109.com
wrote:
> I think the problem that Lionel and I have is that it's not clear what
> the intent actually is. Serious photographers, yes -- meaning those
> who don't just want a point-n-shoot to send photographs of the kids to
> grandma. But I would expect that applies to E20 users just as much as
> Digital Rebel.
Yes, and it can also apply to users of compact cameras, or medium format
cameras, or view cameras, but that's not actually the intent of the
proposal. An E20 user can be just as serious about photography as a
Digital Rebel user, but the two aren't likely to find the same discussions
equally useful, any more than a view camera user (digital or not) will
find the discussions in the proposed group useful, or any more than a
compact camera user (however serious) will find them useful. They're
just not used and talked about in the same way. Users of a hypothetical
digital Leica M8, however, will probably find themselves right at home
in the proposed group -- that kind of camera is used by the same sort
of people in the same ways and presents the same kind of topics.
How do you think your E20 user is going to feel after the tenth time
he's told he can solve his problem by getting a different camera, one
he probably doesn't even want? Don't you think he might rather get
advice from similar users that he might find actually useful? How
much of that is there going to be in the proposed group?
On the other hand, a Leica rangefinder user is going to be in the same
place, discussion-wise, as the rest of the folks in the proposed group,
so it makes no sense to exclude him just because we don't happen to have
a simple word that covers both technical types of cameras. Creating an
arbitrary division of discussion based on something that has nothing to
do with the way people discuss things is a bad idea.
--
Jeremy | jeremy@exit109.com
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|