XPost: rec.photo.digital 
 From: bwr607@hotmail.com 
  
 Jeremy Nixon  wrote in 
 news:10jpgajqlaosdef@corp.supernews.com: 
  
 > Why would someone be either hurt or confused, being told a better place 
 > to get advice?  What kind of advice or comments are they going to get in 
 > this proposed group?  Why would they *want* to participate?  Why should 
 > they be expected to use the group, just because their camera happens to 
 > fit the strict technical definition of SLR, even though most of the 
 > group's content is not likely to be useful or interesting to them -- 
 > unless they happen to be looking to buy a new camera? 
 > 
 > Why divide discussion according to a strict technical definition, when 
 > that definition has no real relation to the way people discuss the 
 > topic? 
  
 Those are some excellent points. 
  
 -- 
 Bill 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)