From: nop@alt.net 
  
 Kibo informs me that Woodchuck Bill  stated that: 
  
 >Lionel  wrote in 
 >news:pm8pj0hfc623cc1bhdfqnkoev8e4qfhpso@4ax.com: 
 > 
 >> Fortunately, the hierarchy isn't /that/ bad. (Although it does have its 
 >> moments wher you could be forgiven for thinking it.) Making sure that 
 >> the name & charter are crystal clear to potential users will prevent 
 >> most religious wars. 
 > 
 >Thad and and Alan shared their 3rd RFD with me and David in advance, to 
 >prevent any overlap with the ZLR proposal (which is already posted). I can 
 >say that it is very clear that no high end digital camera will be left out 
 >of either of the two newsgroups. 
  
 That's not the point. 
  
 >.and the line is very clear cut. 
  
 Sorry, but it most definitely is not clear. What is the problem you guys 
 have with addressing the question I keep on asking you about why you 
 don't just drop all this stuff in the charter about non-DSLRs? 
 Do you guys realise that you're slowly changing me from someone who was 
 enthusiastically in favour of the proposal, to someone who may vote 
 against it in order to prevent the same topicality flamage that we get 
 now in RPE3? 
  
 >Please keep the thread in news.groups only, as it was intended. TIA. 
  
 I'm merely posting my followups to wherever the previous poster left 
 them. 
  
 -- 
    W 
  . | ,. w ,   "Some people are alive only because 
   \\|/  \\|/     it is illegal to kill them."    Perna condita delenda est 
 ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)