From: david-taylor@blueyonder.co.not-this-bit.nor-this-part.uk 
  
 Lionel wrote: 
 [] 
 >> Please stop taking what I said in such a serious, literal fashion. 
 > 
 > Sorry David, I'm not trying to get on your case over this. I'm just 
 > trying to make the point that it's normal for groups to have some 
 > degree of overlap in topicality, & that it's not automatically a bad 
 > thing. I'm afraid that these sorts of discussions do tend to become 
 > pretty literal & legalistic. I apologise if I've come across as 
 > attacking you. 
  
 I accept that point, and your apology.  I wasn't really asking for one, 
 though!  I do agree that getting a charter right is important, and having 
 the words agreed by the potential users. 
  
 >> Someone (not me) suggested that RPE3 was the place for a topic.  I 
 >> simply said that if that was the case, I saw no reason to change the 
 >> practice. The users of the new groups will ultimately decide what is 
 >> acceptable on the group.  I do agree about reducing the level of 
 >> traffic on RPD and I am actively trying to help reduce that. 
 > 
 > Yes, understood. :) 
  
 We are in agreement, then. 
  
 Cheers, 
 David 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)