XPost: rec.photo.digital 
 From: bwr607@hotmail.com 
  
 andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid wrote in 
 news:10jp7co49vbv992@news.supernews.com: 
  
 > In news.groups Alan Browne  wrote: 
 >> andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid wrote: 
 > 
 >>> Hey, I don't know!  One of the proponents seems to think that digital 
 >>> view cameras aren't allowed. 
 > 
 >> It really doesn't matter.  There are very few digital view 
 >> cameras and those who use them would probably care less about rpd 
 >> and rpd.slr. ... and those viewcamera users who do participate 
 >> would be welcome ... but I doubt they would stick around very much. 
 > 
 > I agree with you. 
 > 
 > However, the purpose of probing the extreme cases is to see if the 
 > proposal, as it stands, makes sense.  By throwing in a few weird 
 > examples it's possible to forese problems that might arise in the 
 > future. 
 > 
 > It's better to argue now about such things before the charter is 
 > frozen. 
  
 Charters are never frozen. 
  
  
 -- 
 Bill 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)