XPost: rec.photo.digital 
 From: nop@alt.net 
  
 Kibo informs me that Woodchuck Bill  stated that: 
  
 >Lionel  wrote in 
 >news:g9koj0lp6dlredbc1leurtj63qek5ski7v@4ax.com: 
 > 
 >> What, like the Canon G3, for example? That's a digital camera with 
 >> interchangeable lenses, but I don't think too many people would describe 
 >> it as a digital SLR. 
 > 
 >The lens does not come off on a G3. 
  
 No, but you can attach various lenses to one, & many people will see 
 that as being 'interchangable', & IMO, it's just a another example of 
 how the fuzziness of the scope in the charter will cause confusion & 
 friction. 
  Nobody involved in writing the RFD has yet explained why they think it 
 would be a bad thing to just make the scope of the proposed group 
 *exactly* equivalent to the name of the group, thereby eliminating these 
 sorts of problems. 
  
 -- 
    W 
  . | ,. w ,   "Some people are alive only because 
   \\|/  \\|/     it is illegal to kill them."    Perna condita delenda est 
 ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)