XPost: rec.photo.digital 
 From: edward_ohare@nospam.yahoo.com.invalid 
  
 On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 14:13:30 -0000, andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid 
 wrote: 
  
  
 >This is doubly strange when you consider that the final paragraph in 
 >this snippet can also be applied to digital rangefinders.  That's what 
 >I'm trying to get at: the sheer lack of logic in this proposal. 
  
  
 Certainly.  First of all, Thad has done a wonderful job of dealing 
 with criticism and has been responsive to that criticism voiced by 
 enough people that it should be considered.  However, it is my 
 conclusion that what the proposal is about is a group for what Thad 
 considers to be **real** digital cameras.  The problem is defining 
 what is a **real** digital camera. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)