XPost: rec.photo.digital 
 From: Paul-Ebermann@gmx.de 
  
 "Woodchuck Bill" skribis: 
 > "James Silverton"  wrote in [...] 
 > 
 > > my current inclination would be to vote yes on rpd.slr-systems, ~zlr 
 > > and ~rangefinder and no on ~point+shoot. 
 > 
 > That's fair, but you might want to at least consider voting "abstain" on 
 > any groups you do not plan to use. If they do not receive enough "yes" 
 > votes on their own merit, then they are not justified in being created. 
  
 Is there an possibility to add a clarification 
 in the CfV? 
  
 "Please vote Yes on the groups you want to read, 
  no on the groups you think are damaging, and 
  otherwise Abstain." 
  
 (The exact wording should be improved.) 
  
 In a multi-group proposal, more people will 
 vote for (or against) groups they aren't 
 interested in, just since they are voting 
 anyway. 
  
  
 Paul 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)