From: brian@gweep.ca
Wayne Brown writes:
> CLI is a well-known acronym that usually means something entirely
> different from the subject of the proposed group, so the two cases
> aren't strictly analogous...
Amen. Within the context of comp.*, CLI is clearly not what the
proponents want to talk about. Even within the context of comp.std.* or
comp.lang.* I'm very skeptical about using the TLA as the name. There
is a Posix standard for the unix shell, if I recall correctly, and I
could certainly see a group where people would discuss CLI languages
(eg. Bourne shell, C shell, etc).
Unfortunately I can't think of a better name, but comp.std.cli is, IMO,
not a good one.
Brian.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|