XPost: rec.photo.digital 
 From: bwr607@hotmail.com 
  
 "Paul Ebermann"  wrote in 
 news:chv9u4.3vv7g89.1@hamster.epaul.my-fqdn.de: 
  
 >> That's fair, but you might want to at least consider voting "abstain" 
 >> on any groups you do not plan to use. If they do not receive enough 
 >> "yes" votes on their own merit, then they are not justified in being 
 >> created. 
 > 
 > Is there an possibility to add a clarification 
 > in the CfV? 
 > 
 > "Please vote Yes on the groups you want to read, 
 >  no on the groups you think are damaging, and 
 >  otherwise Abstain." 
 > 
 > (The exact wording should be improved.) 
 > 
 > In a multi-group proposal, more people will 
 > vote for (or against) groups they aren't 
 > interested in, just since they are voting 
 > anyway. 
  
 Unfortunately not. IMHO, this part of the CFV process should be improved. 
  
 -- 
 Bill 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)