XPost: rec.woodworking 
 From: dingbat@codesmiths.com 
  
 On 11 Sep 2004 01:02:30 -0700, VitoKuhn@hotmail.com (VK) wrote: 
  
 >There is nothing wrong with the existing group 
  
 Exactly. 
  
  
 Some specific questions: 
  
  - Who are you ?   You're near invisible from previous postings. Why 
 should we give moderator status to you of all people, let alone 
 someone else who we have never heard of at all ?    Why has there been 
 no attempt made to even talk to some of the high volume posters and 
 see if they would be interested in sharing the moderation task ? 
  
  - A hotmail address isn't a convincing technical argument for being 
 capable of moderating this high volume ng single-handed. 
  
  - How _are_ you going to deal with single-handed moderation of a very 
 large group ? 
  
   - How do postings arrive in rec.woodworking.moderated ?  Will they 
 be posted to it, or are you planning to make it a digest of the 
 existing rec.woodworking traffic ?   I can tell you know that you do 
 _not_ have my agreement to repost any of my postings into this new ng. 
  
  - How are you going to exclude the puppy whizzer etc. from a 
 moderated group ?  There is a problem with these fools (best dealt 
 with by killfiling), but do you think forged moderation is really 
 beyond the wit of trolls ? 
  
  
 I accept that it's your right as a usenet user to post any deluded RFD 
 you might wish to. However there seems to be a total absence of any 
 support for it, and I look forward to the CFV (if any) being 
 thoroughly defeated. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)