
| Msg # 143 of 32000 on ZZNE4431, Saturday 5-12-23, 11:58 |
| From: MATTHEW MONTCHALIN |
| To: ARTHUR L. RUBIN |
| Subj: Re: DNA registries (was rec.pets.cats.br |
XPost: alt.cats, rec.pets.cats.health+behav From: mmontcha@OregonVOS.net On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Arthur L. Rubin wrote: |Matthew Montchalin wrote: | |> If an owner can show that her cat shares the relevant DNA, she could |> compel the organization to have her cat recorded? Assuming the fee |> is paid? | |Unlikely. If it's a private organization, I agree. Highly unlikely. |The registry includes lineage, so an inexpensive test |would not be adequate to match Tom and Queen's DNA. Even if it were an *expensive* test, the privacy of an organization stems from the power to exclude other people from joining. They don't have to give a reason why, it could be for no reason at all. |A full DNA analysis showing and EXACTLY 50% match might |be reasonable evidence of descent*, but.... | |And would this question be appropriate for rcp.breeds? Well, would you suggest sci.bio.misc? --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,097 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca