
| Msg # 116 of 32000 on ZZNE4431, Saturday 5-12-23, 11:57 |
| From: MATTHEW MONTCHALIN |
| To: ORCHID |
| Subj: Re: RFD: rec.pets.cats.breeds |
XPost: alt.cats, us.config From: mmontcha@OregonVOS.net On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Orchid wrote: |Now, back onto topic. | | The reasoning for rec.pets.cats.breeds being the newsgroup |name is that it follows the same sort of naming convention that exists |in the dogs groups. The group for purebred discussion is |rec.pets.dogs.breeds, and the naming makes a lot of sense to me. |People looking for information on specific breeds will be easily able |to find the group. I do not feel that 'pedigrees' is as easily |findable for the average person, and thus would oppose a |name/heirarchy change. | I also do not feel that limiting it to a US group is a good |idea. I look at it as though it were supplementing, not limiting it. |There are many multinational registries in the cat show world, |including TICA (The International Cat Association) and FIFe |(Federation Internationale Feline). Good to know. |As well, cat breeds are not as splintered internationally as dog |breeds -- while you can tell an English Lab from an American Lab, |you will have very much less luck telling an English Bengal from |a US Bengal from an Aussie Bengal. Well, I think I could tell a dog from a wolf, but sometimes it's pretty hard. | I am currently working on a rewrite of the proposal, and |plan to submit it to additional groups as per various requests. I think one of my points was, why limit yourself to the rec.* hierarchy? There are other hierarchies out there, and you could keep them all busy with your proposals. --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,110 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca