From: owner@bugs.debian.org 
  
 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... 
  
 Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2025 00:49:32 +0000 
 with message-id  
 and subject line Bug#1118236: fixed in tucnak 4.67-2 
 has caused the Debian Bug report #1118236, 
 regarding tucnak: suggests ntp and ntpdate which are not in unstable 
 to be marked as done. 
  
 This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. 
 If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the 
 Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. 
  
 (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this 
 message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system 
 misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org 
 immediately.) 
  
  
 -- 
 1118236: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1118236 
 Debian Bug Tracking System 
 Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems 
  
 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2025 05:31:21 +0000 
 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
  (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org 
 X-Spam-Level: 
 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, 
  DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,PGPSIGNATURE,SPF_HELO_NONE, 
  SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no 
  version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 11; hammy, 123; neutral, 21; spammy, 
  0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*ct:application, 
  0.000-+--H*ct:protocol, 0.000-+--H*ct:micalg, 0.000-+--H*ct:signed, 
  0.000-+--H*ct:pgp-signature 
 Return-path:  
 Received: from mail.pina.cat ([213.167.241.144]:49684) 
  by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_P 
 S_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) 
  (Exim 4.96) 
  (envelope-from ) 
  id 1v9d3g-008fah-1M 
  for submit@bugs.debian.org; 
  Fri, 17 Oct 2025 05:31:21 +0000 
 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 
  (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) 
   key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest 
 SHA256) 
  (No client certificate requested) 
  (Authenticated sender: carles) 
  by mail.pina.cat (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D675F551A8 
  for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 05:31:18 +0000 (UTC) 
 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pina.cat; s=201905; 
  t=1760679078; bh=SlWEwpIvHkFgwERm/X3P212ySQXgOF4Vw0Yw8bI+fKg=; 
  h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; 
  b=U1MdTpvvqI5FhnGGu1/EuCkevInEqca6DoFMocBCpYKcrocxu6fL7sqfVA7v8qSf+ 
   +6JFKEEL3PsapoFMhbYuew7+OfCN3LwihZwI3wsK62CishNNZj2J5FIWjzXIoU9U2C 
   vNNMUOayN6Tkx/MJfBAflCBADPtvk96eSNt1hiYz+acUWLnKfit9LOMP3L0r+HMq9u 
   NqdIMjAhFxE2F1HF4QVN8ETSv555RHoOMbBiXIPnIO/8vKGUUHk4NoNBTlOgIaNgXt 
   3ilA3QmXWXlrQ0R2NJbIq+Xv2lHUhxg4YBQAaqfj2MS3ec6/5DQEIl0Olu+Occzwdm 
   hbrSwhew6qigQ== 
 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 
  by pinux.Home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DF0B20374 
  for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 07:31:18 +0200 (CEST) 
 Received: by pinux.Home (Postfix, from userid 1000) 
  id 4383DB2037B; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 07:31:15 +0200 (CEST) 
 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 07:31:14 +0200 
 From: Carles Pina i Estany  
 To: submit@bugs.debian.org 
 Subject: tucnak: suggests ntp and ntpdate which are not in unstable 
 Message-ID:  
 MIME-Version: 1.0 
 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; 
  protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1/qWnjxu7uSZClMC" 
 Content-Disposition: inline 
 Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org 
  
  
 --1/qWnjxu7uSZClMC 
 Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=utf-8 
 Content-Disposition: inline 
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 
 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 07:31:14 +0200 
 From: Carles Pina i Estany  
 To: submit@bugs.debian.org 
 Subject: tucnak: suggests ntp and ntpdate which are not in unstable 
  
  
 Subject: tucnak: suggests ntp and ntpdate which are not in unstable 
 Package: tucnak 
 Version: 4.67-1 
 Usertags: package-relations package-relations-suggests 
 Severity: wishlist 
  
 Dear maintainer, 
  
 I see that the package tucnak (version 4.67-1) suggests ntp and ntpdate 
 which are not in unstable. 
  
 This can be seen in https://packages.debian.org/unstable/tucnak . Search 
 for "Package not available". 
  
 The missing packages used to be in Debian but they were removed some 
 time ago: 
  
 - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ntp 
 - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ntpdate 
  
 Should they be dropped or changed? Should it suggest something else such 
 as systemd-timesyncd? chrony? 
  
 Thank you, 
  
 -- 
 Carles Pina i Estany 
 https://carles.pina.cat | carles@pina.cat | cpina@debian.org 
  
 --1/qWnjxu7uSZClMC 
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" 
  
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- 
  
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEth6/Zob9uGYomaJ+qAKIT2ClX4EFAmjx1KIACgkQqAKIT2Cl 
 X4Ed7w/6AvsGeIiCanKPhEBUln5LvuA2KoIz/Az1JYp7Sq4kVt3QXpiktjF4S/da 
 Cdu3HfMCFUA4CxpXgBTNIcOtgp+NYGHOC0z2lhUSgeECS3AUhl7x3TdY2LdAL2Aj 
 n9lyt73iwWi8ccj8PM6NBUmciHlGuWgRPD/2gYx5XMTHTom8rxW4r3EdBUt1cC5H 
 Mk7vdpp7XN4GUTdM46HXUjfLPae2qvxjvzg0jXgzISgk/W6/lF3aMsWyJuQYzh6r 
 1xyggEqmSvMgr2w9+67euOqJ/eko1KsUYWREzKTF8v7SNqclgKZzisaDRwMFtbpG 
 207/C+hH3CqnGlKGl5YeMZ6HA//vZ/zFjzIZOiUTZbcqwRXUMDacUG3tWfKKAdy9 
 NcvMJ4X/MdrKuB6pJ7K7DGTLkSTZ5+VSLKHF/8gO/799qvEJkC31q13Dw8YhthPr 
 OJLThga9+hQEOhqG99/SUtLgkVUBBQt7ZdbL4MX8EIqR5ydfhBO8agzSTdW8/1E/ 
 SugGsYZ/0etAjBKJmXtrSU83ctZLefswojNOsOSyMpJ2P7NFN7dUPOb7V3UNNZOL 
 F8ip0w0ibyaDj7x4IsdJ/RHJKRhj5pxW+elsh7xqMCFzCirqxrX3Z4rEYjVYKBUK 
 AiNJbRmxt/hSAHehCy0LamZ3Er/qwtaSONemOWGrNS4hPuC6vk0=tq5D 
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 
  
  
 [continued in next message] 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)