
| Msg # 41 of 86 on ZZLI4428, Friday 9-04-25, 2:00 |
| From: MARCOS DEL SOL VIVES |
| To: ALL |
| Subj: Bug#1113864: Replace -fcf-protection=ful |
XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel From: marcos@orca.pet El 03/09/2025 a las 17:47, Guillem Jover escribi€€: > Hi! > > On Wed, 2025-09-03 at 16:24:50 +0200, Marcos Del Sol Vives wrote: >> Package: dpkg-dev >> Version: 1.22.21 >> Priority: wishlist >> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org > >> Currently, on amd64 and i386 as of Trixie, packages are being built by >> default with -fcf-protection=full. This results in shadow stacks and IBT >> (branch tracking) being enabled on binaries. > > dpkg-buildflags only emits €€-fcf-protection€€ on amd64. My bad! I am not familiar with dpkg-dev's source code nor autoconf scripts, and since the first result of -fcf-protection did not indicate any kind of filtering (https://salsa.debian.org/dpkg-team/dpkg/-/blob/mai /m4/dpkg-compiler.m4), I thought it was actually being applied to everything! I found now the real code that enables it at https://salsa.debian.org/dpkg-team/dpkg/-/blob/main/scripts/Dpkg Vendor/Debian.pm#L637-650 and yes, you're absolutely right, it's amd64-only! > So, disabling the full CET would regress the current support and make > enabling it fully in the future harder. > > But it's not clear to me what's the status of submission for userland > IBT in Linux. Seems based on a random GitHub Gist that enabling (at least for testing) IBT in user-land is fairly straightforward on a Linux kernel: https://gist.github.com/sroettger/fe66f7eb0cb10a8ebd1454875a7131ea So I assume considering the little effort required to enable it, that it'll eventually also land in user-space. I would try enabling it on my machine out of curiosity with Trixie or Sid, but unfortunately my AMD 8745H does only support shadow stacks. > So given the above, I'm inclined to mark this wontfix and close, and > then "someone" needs to driver the transition to its conclusion. That's an option, yes. I opened this issue because I was asked to, and because I would personally wait until there are IBT-enabled kernels to enable one such flag to perform proper testing so binaries don't become larger prematurely. However I see your point enabling it now so all packages don't need to be recompiled further down with CET could be benefitial for a quicker rollout. Greetings, Marcos --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,098 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca