XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist 
 From: donaldbroatch@googlemail.com 
  
 On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 09:29:48 +0200 Holger Wansing 
  wrote: 
 > Hi, 
 > 
 > Am 22. September 2025 02:24:36 MESZ schrieb Brandon Werner 
 > : 
 > >Hello, 
 > >I did an install of xfce with the daily netinst image to test this 
 > >change to tasksel. I ended up with both light-locker and 
 > >xfce4-screensaver installed. I think this may be because the control 
 > >file for xfce4-session lists light-locker first in the screensavers 
 > >it recommends but I am not sure. 
 > 
 > tasksel does no longer pull light-locker in by its package 
 > dependencies for xfce, so there must be some other Depend/Recommend, 
 > most likely from an xfce metapackage. 
 > 
 > 
 > Holger 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > -- 
 > Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3 
 > 
 > 
  
 xfce4-session recommends light-locker, but also xfce4-screensaver: 
  
 rec: light-locker 
     simple screen locker for lightDM display manager 
 or xfce4-screensaver 
     screen saver and locker that is integrated with the xfce4 desktop 
 or xscreensaver 
     Screensaver daemon and frontend for X11 
 or mate-screensaver 
     MATE screen saver and locker 
  
 Would it cause light-locker to be installed if task-xfce-desktop is no 
 longer pulling light-locker? 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)