From: nilesh@debian.org 
  
 On 15/08/25 12:37 am, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote: 
 > To avoid confusion: I€€€m perfectly happy with Salsa being used as a way 
 > to send patches, even as a merge request if it is what the contributor 
 > would use (I would have been OK with a repo URL + branch name). But the 
 > patches are only part of a contribution, and patches without 
 > communication are not going to be included in any of the packages I 
 > maintain. 
 Opening PRs/MRs are typically how most of the git forges are used for 
 contributions. 
  
 Having salsa and allowing to open MRs and then saying that you will accept a 
 patch 
 only if you file a bug report via BTS with proper tags is somewhat an 
 anti-pattern. 
  
 Opening an MR here *is* a way to communicate with you. Mailing you 
 separately 
 is adding 
 another layer to that communication which I think I do not understand. 
 Sending 
 a mail/mentioning 
 on MR makes sense if it does not come into notice or the maintainer forgets 
 about it. 
  
 But deliberately ignoring it is a little odd. But then, YMMV €€\\_(€€€)_/€€. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)