home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZLI4422             linux.debian.devel             1179 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 986 of 1179 on ZZLI4422, Friday 8-14-25, 6:21  
  From: RUSS ALLBERY  
  To: OTTO@DEBIAN.ORG  
  Subj: Re: Please check open Merge Requests bef  
 From: rra@debian.org 
  
 Otto Kek€€l€€inen  writes: 
  
 > For most people it is surely accidental, and sending a reminder to 
 > check for open MRs like I did today can help. 
  
 You didn't send a reminder. You sent a hostile message accusing anyone in 
 Debian who uploaded a package without looking at MRs first of 
 intentionally ignoring MRs and ruining the experience of contributing to 
 Debian. A reminder would be something like: 
  
     I've recently run into a few cases where a new contributor to Debian 
     created an MR on Salsa which received no response, and then saw the 
     maintainer later upload the package with equivalent changes while 
     having apparently ignored or not seen the MR. I know this is often 
     unintentional, but it can feel rather demoralizing. 
  
     Could maintainers who want to accept MRs for their packages try to 
     remember to check Salsa when working on a package and see if there are 
     any pending MRs to merge? If you don't want to accept MRs, please 
     disable them in Salsa so that people don't invest time and effort in 
     unwanted MRs. 
  
 I feel bad when I do this, and I appreciate the reminder! I don't 
 appreciate being accused of intentionally ignoring MRs just to make people 
 feel bad, since that's not what I'm doing. 
  
 > I am contemplating if I should share the cases of bad behavior my 
 > mentees experienced when trying to contribute, as you don't seem to 
 > believe that such could have happened. 
  
 That is not even remotely what I said. Come on now. 
  
 > For now I think that just reminding people about checking MRs and 
 > reviewing them as a general advice is the best course of action. 
  
 I think that's a fine idea, and I would welcome actual reminders rather 
 than accusations. Even better is to make that information more visible in 
 places where I already look so that I don't need a reminder. 
  
 > Also note that I suggest people to *review* MRs, I didn't say at any 
 > point that one must accept and merge all contributions. 
  
 Again, just to set expectations, I by and large am not going to do a back 
 and forth with a contributor about an MR. I simply do not have the time. I 
 am either going to merge it and fix it if needed, or I am going to close 
 it with some explanation and either make a different fix or no fix. 
 Reviewing an MR and explaining to someone how to fix it the way that I 
 would like it is a lot of work and not fun, so I save that energy for my 
 day job where it's part of the job. 
  
 I realize people learn better from interactive reviews, but I am not at 
 present volunteering as a teacher. 
  
 -- 
 Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,090 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca